Home » Articles posted by Adam Tarsia

Author Archives: Adam Tarsia

Reflection

Adam Tarsia

Prof. Nicoludis

Reflection Essay

12/14/20

As I reflect on my first semester of college, I am somewhat disappointed in my initial experience as a student, however I cannot help but be thankful for the good health my family and myself have had. Some classes dragged on and were difficult to engage with, but in some, I was able to take away some genuine knowledge. I feel that due to this class’s content especially, my writing organization skills have grown significantly. The practice I have had throughout the drafting process of my four essays this semester has helped me develop in nearly all aspects as a writer, however, I have noticed the most improvement in my ability to thoroughly plan, organize and write a paper efficiently.

    The first essay of my career at CCNY, the Personal Narrative paper, was an introduction to many of the methods we used over the course of the semester in this class. Preceded by some various activity or reading-based assignments, the Personal Narrative was the first piece of writing that became a true focal point of the semester. On my first draft of the essay, I lost sight of a concise delivery, providing overwhelming description of the setting in lieu of support for my claim, and became unsure of the goal I set out to accomplish with the paper. However, the questions and constructive criticism of my classmates in the breakout room sessions helped facilitate my ability to thoroughly negotiate a goal for the piece, which was to explain the impact of Sunken Meadow State Park on my life. Through their help I was able to formulate a clear thesis and better tie back in my description-based storytelling to the main theme of the paper. Moving forward in the semester as a writer, I made it a priority to formulate a clear thesis for my papers and identify concrete evidence to explain my point, which I heavily emphasized in my Op-Ed paper as well.

    Writing the Op-Ed was a fun experience, as the more I researched and organized my evidence, the more I opened my own eyes to the real-world consequences and scale of the argument I was constructing about influencers’ true importance in America’s political landscape. I enhanced my strategies for planning through the proposal, right away making sure to map out an articulate stance on the topic and supporting it by roughly providing some of the scenarios I would later describe as evidence in my essay in a sort of “roadmap”. I practiced searching the internet to find the numbers that would incongruously prove those rough scenarios as evidence of my thesis through location of the right articles, statistics and videos, strengthening my ability to integrate multiple sources and present them to the reader in a creative manner. I enjoyed drawing on the statistics I made to create a streamlined, logical argument for my point, and once again, with the help of my classmates in the group sessions, I was able to pare down the overly verbose introduction I had in my first draft. From this paper, I learned that I feel my writing style suits an argumentative essay best, and tried to model my following two proposals and essays after an argumentative essay.

My Critical Analysis proposal for Blonde by Frank Ocean took hours to compose, and with that practice, I was able to significantly progress in my source use strategies for organizing evidence into a coherent paper. First, I listened to and engaged in analysis of the album for like the 20th time, jotting down formulated opinions throughout which eventually turned into my thesis. Next, I used a combination of evidence from the album as well as outside sources that supported the thesis and wrote down which themes to tie the evidence into, accomplishing my goal and creating a clear vision of Blonde to provide for the reader to experience. In comparison to my other essays, I did not have to shed as much material from the paper after expanding on my “roadmap”, as I consciously avoided rambling and kept my point as concise as possible. The only edits suggested by classmates and Professor N. to my draft were cleaning up my MLA formatting, speaking to my progress as a writer this semester as well as my improvement in planning/organizing a concise essay. Through the analysis, I was also able to gain a deeper appreciation for something I thought I already appreciated a lot, which is pretty special.

    For this essay, I have drawn from all the strategies I have used previously on the other papers. I negotiated clear goals in the roadmap document my classmates helped me develop and made sure to tie the points back to my development through accomplishment of the class goals without excessive word use, especially in formulation of an articulate plan for my paper. I feel that the small group meetings definitely helped me improve the most as an essay writer, maybe because they were an inkling of that class interaction I have missed so much and I was always very enthusiastic to talk to others. During review of classmates’ papers, I was definitely overwhelmingly constructive and tried to acknowledge their range of linguistic differences in order to make better suggestions for their papers, but it was tough understanding everyone’s real abilities without getting to really know them. Here’s to hoping for a little bit more ability to interact with everyone come February.

I know that this class has significantly improved my abilities as a writer this semester, and going forward, I’ll definitely use what I learned here in any class that requires creative writing. I enjoyed the writing, but I also enjoyed the synchronous section meetings. The content was always engaging and the class was definitely a little bit of relief from some of my more technical and boring lectures. Thank you Professor N. for making the rough semester Fall 2020 has been a little bit more enjoyable!

Portfolio Paper Organization

acknowledge your and others’ range of linguistic differences as resources, and draw on those resources to develop rhetorical sensibility

  • Eh (covid limited real solid interaction)

enhance strategies for reading, drafting, revising, editing, and self-assessment:

  • 2nd essay quickwrite
  • Frank ocean proposal

negotiate your own writing goals and audience expectations regarding conventions of genre, medium, and rhetorical situation

  • All 3 papers

develop and engage in the collaborative and social aspects of writing processes\

  •  Mention the group writes

engage in genre analysis and multimodal composing to explore effective writing across disciplinary contexts and beyond

  • Critical analysis

formulate and articulate a stance through and in your writing

  • how I developed over time

practice using various library resources, online databases, and the Internet to locate sources appropriate to your writing projects

  • Mla writing

strengthen your source use practices (including evaluating, integrating, quoting, paraphrasing, summarizing, synthesizing, analyzing, and citing sources)

  • Last 2 essays but already good

Group Essays by themes:

Narrative: 

  • Negotiate goals
  • Develop social aspect
  • Formulate

OpEd:

  • Strategy
  • Negotiation
  • Formulate
  • Practice

Crit Analysis:

  • Enhance 
  • Negotiate
  • Engage
  • Formulate
  • Practice
  • Strengthen

1 Paragraph per essay explaining how I:

  • Accomplished the goal
  • Developed as a writer

1 Paragraph explaining:

  • The shortcomings I had
  • How the social aspect/groupwriting part was most developmentally important for me

Thesis:

  • The practice I have had throughout the drafting process of my four essays this quarter has helped me develop in nearly all aspects as a writer, however, I have noticed the most improvement in my ability to thoroughly formulate the idea for, organize and develop a paper efficiently.

Blonde Proposal

Thesis: Frank Ocean’s “Blonde” is the swan song of the conceptual album, a thematically streamlined masterpiece exploring sexuality, materialism, and race through the dual lens of his own deeply personal experiences as both a perpetrator and victim of circumstances created by those issues.

How to tie the sources in: 

Album:

For the album, I’ll be using the cover art with the band aid and alternate spelling and tying it in to theme of sexuality/masculinity through the chris brown fight. Introduction to all themes in Nikes, through song/video.  Beat switch in Nights directly in middle of album – emphasis on duality, change in production style, transition from active to passive lyrical content, frustration with themes (solo reprise) . Explain how themes from one song tie into the other. Ex. From Ivy to pink+white (relationships), from pink+white to be yourself (self-reliance). Last few songs transitioning from frustration to acceptance ex. (godspeed-futura free) (how far is a lightyear 9.4x1012km, song is 9.4 min) 

Nikes video:

Partying, drugs (materialism), explicit sexuality, pictures of asap yams/pimp c/trayvon martin (race), shift in verse lines up with shift in cinematography (duality), tie in to song as introduction

Coming out letter:

Tie into theme of sexuality, contrast to the chris brown fight, tie into duality

Chris brown fight report:

Tie into sexuality/masculinity, contrast to coming out letter, tie into duality

Streamlined phases of album:

Stages of grief:

  • Denial of issues from a personal or relationship(breakup) standpoint (nikes)
  • Anger  (ivy)
  • Bargaining pink&white (idea of “we have no control anyways, so why not just go with it”, weather analogies) to eventual depression (realizing the weather will destroy everything anyways)
  • Good guy is acceptance (self reliance) and also solo (comfortable being lonely/ending on perfect authentic cadence)

Reminiscence: 

-skyline to-first half of nights frank reminisces on his past relationships in a stream of consciousness delivery

Frustration:

-Andre 3000 was a very deliberate choice for solo reprise, jaded artist with a frustrated verse sets the tone

-Facebook story

Frustration/letting go transition:

White Ferrari: Frank chooses to see the beauty in an old relationship before he truly found his first love (another man as referenced in letter)

Letting go:

Siegfried: acceptance that he will never fit in to the “american dream”

Godspeed/futura free: realizing it’s okay to let go

Album Proposal – discussion board

For my topic to write a critical analysis on, I would like to choose the album Blonde by Frank Ocean. It does an incredible job addressing a vast variety of topics concerning the life of a modern adult, serving as a criticism of materialism and vanity to conveying experiences of racism, heartbreak, and loss. It is one of my favorite albums of all time and it holds a lot of personal weight in my life, but it is also undisputedly one of the most skillfully executed albums ever. The themes are present in every track in some way shape or form, and the creative delivery of the art ranges from modern r&b to experimental ballads inspired by soul, trap, and rock. The lore surrounding the album also only contributes to how meaningful and important the music is. It was released four years after Frank’s previous album, channel orange, and some of the songs were rumored to have up to 50 versions, so his Grammy-winning song selection definitely grants thematic weight to all elements of the album, up to the most minute details. There’s a lot to analyze in the album, it’s an important work of art to me, and I believe that with some time, I could put together a decent critical analysis/interpretation on it.

Op-Ed Proposal

Rough Idea-

In less than a month, an election is taking place. For some people, that election has already begun, as early polling and mail ins have been opened already in some places and are opening in more very soon. I am not old enough to vote yet, and this time around I am feeling somewhat relieved that it is not my duty to pick the lesser of two evils. However the time will eventually come when I am called upon to fulfill my responsibility as an American citizen and decide what is right for the country, in my own eyes. Therefore I have been examining the issue thoroughly, and one thing that kind of disturbs me is the amount of people on both sides of the spectrum twisting facts, spewing misinformation and identifying themselves too much with a certain party, some to the point of blatant disregard for the rights of the people around them. People blindly follow, and are therefore blindly influenced. Desperate to abide by the status quo of their respective communities, people en masse sacrifice their individuality in order to thoroughly align themselves with certain followings. In these cult-like followings, the leaders wield the influence to dictate popularity in all sectors- fashion, music, other people, even science and politics. Considering the incredulous followings some of these leaders possess, millions of theoretical votes are potentially a single check away. The platforms they use to entertain their cults- twitter, tik tok, instagram- all grant the ability to convey messages at their fingertips. I am really just talking about social media “influencers”, but in all seriousness, it’s pretty scary how much sway over their fans these influencers have. The exigence of the matter is that there is an election coming up, and I believe “influencers” with the power to turn the voting tide in entire states have been knowingly (or unknowingly) weaponizing their followings in order to avoid backlash by the status quo they have created. Whether through miniature expressions of political opinion sprinkled into content followed by pleas to attend the polls (jenner, etc), or straight up vote buying (Mongeau), this is already taking place.

Thesis-  Influencers are able to manipulate and weaponize their millions of followers on command, but there is absolutely no way to stop them from deciding the outcome of elections.

Ethos Pathos Logos – Discussion Board

Collapse

Ethos Pathos, and Logos are three of the major rhetorical appeals. Each appeal serves to act as an agent of persuasion utilizing a different approach. Through Ethos, the speaker seeks to persuade the reader by establishing a sense of credibility with their words, granting substantiality to their claims. Through Logos, the speaker guides the reader, through reasoning, to logical conclusions that support the point they are trying to make. Logos is where factual information is used to support opinions and a line of reasoning. When Pathos is employed, the speaker appeals to the emotions of the artist, persuading them by evoking feelings such as sympathy or fear. All three are used interconnectedly by great authors and speakers. For example, if the leader of a nation is convincing their people to go to war, their ethos as a leader is pre-established, and they may pose a problem through an appeal to fear and a sense of brotherhood, or “love for your fellow man” (pathos). The audience will trust the leader that the issue is pressing because of their ethos as a leader (which they may remind the audience of), who will then employ logos to lead their country to the conclusion that the only way to neutralize the threat of another country (which has been established as a threat through an appeal to pathos) is to go to war.

Knowing your audience will always affect the agents of persuasion employed, as well as how they are used. For example, a teacher convincing their preschool class to be quiet for the lesson may offer some kind of reward, such as an extra few minutes of recess time. Their ethos as a teacher gives the students a sense of assurance that the extra recess time can and will be delivered. Logos, however, is the most dominant appeal in this situation, as the teacher offers a direct and concise line of reasoning to the students. The teacher reasons that if the students act accordingly to instruction, then the outcome will be in their favor. In this case, the outcome is extra time to spend in recess. Through this line of reasoning, the teacher most likely will have success in the persuasion of the students, since they have been convinced that the conclusion that the outcome of the situation will benefit them.

Healthcare should be free for all citizens of the United States. For some background on the topic, this is not a completely outlandish proposition. In established and productive countries such as Italy and France, all citizens already receive universal healthcare, with many services such as emergency medicine available to the public for no cost. For a second now, imagine you are the child of a cancer patient, a mere victim of circumstance. Innocent, yet you must carry a burden of pain unimaginable to those who have never experienced it. Unfortunately, costs run high, up to around $300,000 a year. Your family can no longer afford treatment, and your sick mother decides she doesn’t want to run the risk of you inheriting potentially millions in debt. She sadly passes away. Those fighting for a private healthcare industry are fighting for exactly that – victims of circumstance having to choose between millions in debt or death. The total cost of cancer care alone in the US last year was $400b. Thousands of dead children, parents, friends, siblings, and grandchildren would have cost billions more if not for their sacrifice. Pretty expensive, right? Now consider this. The predicted total wealth accumulated in the US this year by the top 1% of wealth earners alone is $140,000,000,000,000. An additional .2%, yes, a point two percent wealth accumulation tax on the top 1% could have paid for all cancer treatment in the United States. Give that one some thought. And to those, especially politicians, in support of a private healthcare system, imagine your baby dying because you couldn’t afford treatment for their leukemia. Remember that thought and remember it would have been due to your failure to implement a tax that could never possibly affect the lives of those who would be taxed by it.

Style/Mindset Discussion Board

1. A mindset is a mental framework that strongly influences how we receive, interpret, react, and respond to information. Those with a fixed mindset are closed off to new information, and consciously (or unconsciously) do not expand their knowledge, and therefore their perspective. Their intelligence also remains static by refusing to accept alternative perspectives. A “growth mindset” is a mindset in which one is willing to accept information from others, even if the information challenges their previous beliefs. Those willing to accept new things will expand their capacity for both intellectual and emotional development. A fixed mindset only stifles progress and hinders development through a toxic, repetitive cycle that revolves around negative reinforcement. When one refuses to believe they can grow, they do not grow, which kills motivation, which leads to unproductiveness, and so on and so forth. When one accepts that they have the ability to learn new things, they believe they can grow, which leads to expansion, which reaffirms their beliefs and the cycle continues.

2. Style is an abstract term that can reference many aspects of literary technique, however it is best described as a concise blend of signature rhetorical devices and techniques employed by an author. Style can also be developed through the tone and context of the statement’s delivery. For example, the style of a presidential speech may be different from that of you greeting your friend. The global perspective focuses on the main presence or absence of rhetorical appeals, devices and modes. This perspective is where the ethos, pathos, and logos of the writing is developed. The local perspective is concerned with the combination of language and syntax in the piece. For example, a monologue from a play, when studied under the global perspective, may utilize pathos to incite a sense of anxiety from the audience. When studied under a local perspective, this can be accomplished with sensory language through a combination of repetition and imagery. Both perspectives offer useful information for analysis, and both are crucial to pay attention to when writing in a professional style. When the local and global perspectives match in purpose and energy, it gives the piece both purpose and momentum.

Free write- Importance of writing for audience

Imagine a scenario in which one drunkenly addresses their professor as a peer while asking for an extended due date, employing profanity and informal slang as agents of persuasion in their plea. Now, I implore the reader to formulate their own conclusion on the result of that plea. It is more than likely that the student will not be receiving any credit for the aforementioned assignment. Once again, I implore the reader to imagine how the outcome may have differed if the student in question addressed their professor in a respectful and professional tone. The result may have drastically changed. Now assume that the assignment from that imaginary scenario is a senior thesis paper. Considering the considerable impact of most thesis papers on GPA, an abysmal mark on one may not be ideal when it is factored in amongst the reduced number of classes most seniors take their final semester. If the student in question was previously teetering around a 3.5 GPA, the opportunity to graduate with honors may slip away. Posing a hypothetical, assume our student has not secured a post-graduation job, but rather has landed an interview with a very important company. Our student has made good use of their time in a prestigious program, making connections and suavely maneuvering the social network of elitist culture, manipulating it to their will. However, it would be erroneous to assume that our student is the only one in that same program, with the same skills, methodically networking. Walking into their interview, they spot a classmate waiting in the same lobby. The two begin to converse and learn they are interviewing for the same position, so both agree to quiz each other as mock interviewers to pass time. Instantly the tension and anxiety melt away, and each feels more comfortable in the presence of a friend. The wait continues, and time is spent reminiscing and enjoying each other’s company. All of a sudden, the door opens and a nervous millennial flees. The shadow of an imposing businessperson approaches, and steps into the light. Our student’s friend from school is called in. “Good luck, you got this!” our student exclaims to their peer. As they turn around to say “Thank you!”, their resume slips out of its folder. Our student good-heartedly offers assistance in cleaning up, and picks up the first page they see. They reach down and flip it over, preparing to hand it back. Curiously handling the paper, they decide to sneakily take a quick glance at their classmate’s work, only to discover the “3.6 GPA (Graduated Cum Laude)” inscribed on the sheet. Their heart drops. And all of a sudden, their mind flashes back to the drunken email.

Critical Analysis Draft

Following the release of Channel Orange, legendary artist Frank Ocean’s debut LP, and a four-year silence, 2016 saw the release of Ocean’s second album, “Endless”, in the format of a video livestream. “Endless” was the final LP required by his Def Jam contract, and upon his contract fulfillment, Ocean was able to distribute an album as a completely independent artist. Now unbound by the sometimes draconian creative requirements of a label, as an independent artist he now held complete artistic freedom over his own work. From that artistic freedom, the most highly anticipated and deeply personal album of Ocean’s career, Blonde, was born. Wasting no time, Ocean released Blonde the day after Endless. The genre blending LP provides highly expressive insight into many of the experiences and themes Channel Orange dealt with, albeit in a conscious, explicit stream of self- expression a label-restricted album could not have. Blonde is the purest manifestation of the conceptual album, a thematically streamlined masterpiece exploring sexuality, masculinity, materialism, fame and race through the dual lens of his own deeply personal experiences as both a perpetrator and victim of circumstances created by those issues. Untainted by corporate greed, Ocean transcends his title as a musician on Blonde and fulfills his vision as a true artist. 

    The very first impression of the album upon the audience is that of the cover. Leaving no room for artistic significance unscathed, Ocean makes a statement by providing an alternate spelling of the LP title, substituting “Blonde” for “Blond”, and including a band-aid on his finger. Here he introduces the dual lens the album is conveyed through, and chooses his masculinity as the focal point of the duality. By drawing contrast to the title’s true feminine connotation, Ocean chooses to highlight the masculine connotation of “Blond”. Exacerbating this sharp contrast is the band-aid on Ocean’s index finger, an allusion to the fight he got into with ex-labelmate Chris Brown, in which Ocean sustained a cut to his index finger, as well as his temple, which he is covering in the album art. This subtle reference harks back to his masculinity as well, as he was referred to as a “f****t” during the fight (TMZ). Evidently Ocean feels as though his queerness has alienated him from fellow male, African-American musicians, even those signed to his label. He chooses to “cover” the album with expressions of masculinity in a symbolic embodiment of the manly “shell” he feels he must wear at times as an openly gay man (Thankyous, Tumblr) in order to fit in with not just society, but those who should be his closest peers.

“Nikes” serves as a proper segway into the album, a tranquilizing ballad through which Frank tells a story in two contrasting voices, which he refers to as “different versions of himself” (New York Times). Echoed through his affirmation, “I got two versions” in the video version of the song, this storytelling perspective shift is the album’s first flirtation with duality. The pitched up vocals of the initial verse gloss over materialism, oscillating between Ocean’s perspective and that of a “mermaid”, his drug dealing cousin’s girlfriend. The album’s first line, “these b****es want Nikes”, amongst other references to jewelry and drugs, signify Ocean’s observations of the designer-obsessed LA party culture he spent years engulfed in, a critique of those he surrounded himself by. The video version of the track also accompanies the “mermaid” portion of the verse with a visual of a young woman writhing around in a tank of water (hence the “mermaid”), seemingly struggling to escape. This potent visual symbolizes the “mermaid”’s trajectory of life, aimlessly floating around, desperate to escape the hopelessly superficial lifestyle and relationship she finds herself in. However, a few lines in the verse iterate Ocean’s own obsession with the material, such as the stanza revolving around “just like you, just like me”. He reflects on the duality of his personal experiences with the material through a critique of his past self and others before switching to the unpitched, jaded, more conscious voice of his current self. The video mirrors the perspective switch, shifting from rapid-fire hazy shots to more lucid and streamlined cinematography depicting both him singing, as well as what he sings about in the verse, representing his now active awareness of the consequences of the lifestyle he leads. Whereas the themes remain similar to that of the first half, the second half of Nikes reaffirms Ocean’s clear recognition of his own present involvement in the culture he so critiques.

Succeeding, “Nikes”, the following tracks from “Ivy” to “Good Guy” recall some of the same themes, however most dominant is the recollection of multiple heartbreaks. Heartbreak manifests itself in several forms throughout this important point of the album, ranging from the both sonically and lyrically distorted nostalgia of “Ivy”, ridden with gut-wrenching and self-critical remembrances such as “I thought that I was dreaming when you said you loved me”, to the concise, remorseful chords of “Good Guy”, a story about mutual lack of intimacy. Ocean presents himself as he was in the moment of a tumultuous heartbreak in “Pink + White”, a Beyoncé-backed piece revolving around multiple allusions to violent weather. Whereas other artists oftentimes share only their side of heartbreak in their art, Ocean assumes a more realistic standpoint of the roles he played in the respective heartbreaks he writes about, from assuming full culpability on “Ivy” to admitting some things just aren’t meant to be on “Self Control” with lines such as “wish we’d grown up on the same advice/And our time was right”. This down-to-earth speaking position from Frank conveys his acceptance of the duality of heartbreak he has experienced. As the famous proverb goes, “it takes two”. In the latter part of the heartbreak portion, the songs’ production style hint at that of the album’s later tracks, replacing the bouncy, heavily instrumental sound in lieu of a more minimalist vibe. As Frank indicates progression past the depths of wallowing loneliness he describes on “Solo”, a song spun around the double entendre between “solo”/”so low”, and mends his heart over the last few tracks, the first half of “Nights” follows Ocean as he happily ponders about an ex aloud over a loose, light beat. Artfully capturing the essence of a late night drive, the track’s first half is the only song on the album thus far to not feature pitched up vocals or ad-libs of any kind, symbolically representing his coherent, content, unconflicted stream of consciousness.

At exactly 30 minutes in to the album, a penetrating guitar refrain precedes a beat switch which divides “Nights”, as well as the rest of the LP. The album’s switch in tone from this crucial point mirrors that of “Nikes, in that the romanticized sentimentality filtering Frank’s thoughts has worn off, emphasizing the duality so prominent throughout the work. Accompanying the beat switch, the general production style of the album transmutes itself into an ambient, contemplative sound. For the most part, discernible instruments melt away as heavily warped versions of themselves and atmospheric synths take their place. Although the predominant voice of the second half of Blonde is that of Ocean’s current self, he makes no appearance at all on its first track. Frank makes the meticulous choice of André 3000 on Solo (Reprise), who spits a tongue-twisting verse in his signature style over raw, emotional piano chords. 3000 was one half of one of the most critically acclaimed duos in hip hop history, OutKast, further contributing to the duality of Blonde, and speaks to the gradual disillusionment he experienced over the course of his storied career. André rants about the corrupt music industry, materialism, rampant and meaningless sexuality, the normalization of police brutality and addiction as he tells the story of his journey, ultimately landing on the question “was I working just way too hard?”. 

Ocean resumes on the following tracks, examining the superficiality of his life through mentions of past relationship experiences before coming to terms with his sexuality as well as rejecting the authenticity of the “American Dream”. The very themes he spent so long experiencing the effects of, perpetrating and critiquing have now consumed him, sonically indicating the duality of his own turbulent mind as Ocean’s vocals are washed over by trancelike, minimalistic instrumentals. On Godspeed, he breaks out of his trance with a powerful vocal delivery reminiscent of that of a gospel singer, coming to the realization that sometimes, it’s just okay to let go and move on. A common cadence (2-chord progression that concludes a musical phrase) employed in religious choir music, the “plagal cadence”, is used throughout the track, before ultimately concluding on a “perfect authentic cadence”, a cadence commonly associated with perfect resolve. The outro is sung by Kim Burrell, a renowned gospel singer, further contributing to the gospel motif in the song. The track’s ending signifies Frank’s ultimate acceptance of all the events documented on Blonde,, comparable to that of the ultimate acceptance of faith in God gospel music often refers to. Continuing the theme of letting go on Futura Free, the final track of the album, Frank looks ahead to the future. Reflecting on his career so far, he decides that in spite of his race, modest beginnings, mortality, and sexuality, he still feels lucky to be where he is in the present moment. Referencing his fight with Chris Brown again, Ocean shrugs the altercation off and takes responsibility for the consequences of his own masculinity. The track ends with one of Ocean’s friends asking “how far is a light year?”. The length of a light year is 9.4×10^12 km, and Futura Free clocks in at 9.4 minutes exactly.

Regardless of one’s opinion of his music, Frank Ocean’s masterful artistry is irrefutably illustrated on “Blonde”. The lens of duality he presents all the issues he scrutinizes through transcends his songwriting, encompassing all aspects of the album’s existence and even his own life. Ocean’s music not only imitates the thematic patterns that have followed him throughout his life and that he has learned to document so well, but as one adage presents it, his life “imitates” the art itself.

Critical Analysis- Blonde

Adam Tarsia

Prof. Nicoludis

Eng 21001 Section D

12/8/2020

Following the release of Channel Orange, legendary artist Frank Ocean’s debut LP, and a four-year silence, 2016 saw the release of Ocean’s second album, “Endless”, in the format of a video livestream. “Endless” was the final LP required by his Def Jam contract, and upon his contract fulfillment, Ocean was able to distribute an album as a completely independent artist. Now unbound by the sometimes draconian creative requirements of a label, as an independent artist he now held complete artistic freedom over his own work. From that artistic freedom, the most highly anticipated and deeply personal album of Ocean’s career, Blonde, was born. Wasting no time, Ocean released Blonde the day after Endless. The genre blending LP provides highly expressive insight into many of the experiences and themes Channel Orange dealt with, albeit in a conscious, explicit stream of self- expression a label-restricted album could not have. Blonde is the purest manifestation of the conceptual album, a thematically streamlined masterpiece exploring sexuality, masculinity, materialism, fame and race through the dual lens of his own deeply personal experiences as both a perpetrator and victim of circumstances created by those issues. Untainted by corporate greed, Ocean transcends his title as a musician on Blonde and fulfills his vision as a true artist. 

    The very first impression of the album upon the audience is that of the cover. Leaving no room for artistic significance unscathed, Ocean makes a statement by providing an alternate spelling of the LP title, substituting “Blonde” for “Blond”, and including a band-aid on his finger. Here he introduces the dual lens the album is conveyed through, and chooses his masculinity as the focal point of the duality. By drawing contrast to the title’s true feminine connotation, Ocean chooses to highlight the masculine connotation of “Blond”. Exacerbating this sharp contrast is the band-aid on Ocean’s index finger, an allusion to the fight he got into with ex-labelmate Chris Brown, in which Ocean sustained a cut to his index finger, as well as his temple, which he is covering in the album art. This subtle reference harks back to his masculinity as well, as he was referred to as a “f****t” during the fight (TMZ.com). Evidently Ocean feels as though his queerness has alienated him from fellow male, African-American musicians, even those signed to his label. He chooses to “cover” the album with expressions of masculinity in a symbolic embodiment of the manly “shell” he feels he must wear at times as an openly gay man (Thankyous, Tumblr) in order to fit in with not just society, but those who should be his closest peers.

“Nikes” serves as a proper segway into the album, a tranquilizing ballad through which Frank tells a story in two contrasting voices, which he refers to as “different versions of himself” (qtd. in Caramanica). Echoed through his affirmation, “I got two versions” in the video version of the song, this storytelling perspective shift is the album’s first flirtation with duality. The pitched up vocals of the initial verse gloss over materialism, oscillating between Ocean’s perspective and that of a “mermaid”, his drug dealing cousin’s girlfriend. The album’s first line, “these b****es want Nikes” (Nikes 0:20-0:30), amongst other references to jewelry and drugs, signify Ocean’s observations of the designer-obsessed LA party culture he spent years engulfed in, a critique of those he surrounded himself by. The video version of the track also accompanies the “mermaid” portion of the verse with a visual of a young woman writhing around in a tank of water (hence the “mermaid”), seemingly struggling to escape (Lebon 00:01:53-00:02:15) . This potent visual symbolizes the “mermaid”’s trajectory of life, aimlessly floating around, desperate to escape the hopelessly superficial lifestyle and relationship she finds herself in. However, a few lines in the verse iterate Ocean’s own obsession with the material, such as the stanza revolving around “just like you, just like me” (Nikes 0:50 -1:30). He reflects on the duality of his personal experiences with the material through a critique of his past self and others before switching to the unpitched, jaded, more conscious voice of his current self (Nikes 3:00-5:15). The video mirrors the perspective switch, shifting from rapid-fire hazy shots to more lucid and streamlined cinematography depicting both him singing, as well as what he sings about in the verse, representing his now active awareness of the consequences of the lifestyle he leads. Whereas the themes remain similar to that of the first half, the second half of Nikes reaffirms Ocean’s clear recognition of his own present involvement in the culture he so critiques.

Succeeding, “Nikes”, the following tracks from “Ivy” to “Good Guy” recall some of the same themes, however most dominant is the recollection of multiple heartbreaks. Heartbreak manifests itself in several forms throughout this important point of the album, ranging from the both sonically and lyrically distorted nostalgia of “Ivy”, ridden with gut-wrenching and self-critical remembrances such as “I thought that I was dreaming when you said you loved me”, to the concise, remorseful chords of “Good Guy”, a story about mutual lack of intimacy. Ocean presents himself as he was in the moment of a tumultuous heartbreak in “Pink + White”, a Beyoncé-backed piece revolving around multiple allusions to violent weather. Whereas other artists oftentimes share only their side of heartbreak in their art, Ocean assumes a more realistic standpoint of the roles he played in the respective heartbreaks he writes about, from assuming full culpability throughout “Ivy” to admitting some things just aren’t meant to be on “Self Control” with lines such as “wish we’d grown up on the same advice/And our time was right” (Self Control 0:43-0:50). This down-to-earth speaking position from Frank conveys his acceptance of the duality of heartbreak he has experienced. As the famous proverb goes, “it takes two”. In the latter part of the heartbreak portion, the songs’ production style hint at that of the album’s later tracks, replacing the bouncy, heavily instrumental sound in lieu of a more minimalist vibe. As Frank indicates progression past the depths of wallowing loneliness he describes on “Solo”, a song spun around the double entendre between “solo”/”so low”, and mends his heart over the last few tracks, the first half of “Nights” follows Ocean as he happily ponders about an ex aloud over a loose, light beat. Artfully capturing the essence of a late night drive, the track’s first half is the only song on the album thus far to not feature pitched up vocals or ad-libs of any kind, symbolically representing his coherent, content, unconflicted stream of consciousness.

At exactly 30 minutes in to the album, a penetrating guitar refrain precedes a beat switch which divides “Nights”, as well as the rest of the LP. The album’s switch in tone from this crucial point mirrors that of “Nikes, in that the romanticized sentimentality filtering Frank’s thoughts has worn off, emphasizing the duality so prominent throughout the work. Accompanying the beat switch, the general production style of the album transmutes itself into an ambient, contemplative sound. For the most part, discernible instruments melt away as heavily warped versions of themselves and atmospheric synths take their place. Although the predominant voice of the second half of Blonde is that of Ocean’s current self, he makes no appearance at all on its first track. Frank makes the meticulous choice of André 3000 on Solo (Reprise), who spits a tongue-twisting verse in his signature style over raw, emotional piano chords. 3000 was one half of one of the most critically acclaimed duos in hip hop history, OutKast, further contributing to the duality of Blonde, and speaks to the gradual disillusionment he experienced over the course of his storied career. André rants about the corrupt music industry, materialism, rampant and meaningless sexuality, the normalization of police brutality and addiction as he tells the story of his journey, ultimately landing on the question “was I working just way too hard?” (Solo (Reprise) 0:58-1:03) . 

Ocean resumes on the following tracks, examining the superficiality of his life through mentions of past relationship experiences before coming to terms with his sexuality as well as rejecting the authenticity of the “American Dream”. The very themes he spent so long experiencing the effects of, perpetrating and critiquing have now consumed him, sonically indicating the duality of his own turbulent mind as Ocean’s vocals are washed over by trancelike, minimalistic instrumentals. On Godspeed, he breaks out of his trance with a powerful vocal delivery reminiscent of that of a gospel singer, coming to the realization that sometimes, it’s just okay to let go and move on. A common cadence (2-chord progression that concludes a musical phrase) employed in religious choir music, the “plagal cadence”, is used throughout the track, before ultimately concluding on a “perfect authentic cadence”, a cadence commonly associated with perfect resolve. The outro is sung by Kim Burrell, a renowned gospel singer, further contributing to the gospel motif in the song. The track’s ending signifies Frank’s ultimate acceptance of all the events documented on Blonde, comparable to that of the ultimate acceptance of faith in God gospel music often refers to. Continuing the theme of letting go on Futura Free, the final track of the album, Frank looks ahead to the future. Reflecting on his career so far, he decides that in spite of his race, modest beginnings, mortality, and sexuality, he still feels lucky to be where he is in the present moment. Referencing his fight with Chris Brown again, Ocean shrugs the altercation off and takes responsibility for the consequences of his own masculinity. The track ends with one of Ocean’s friends asking “how far is a light year?” (Futura Free 9:03-9:05). The length of a light year is 9.4×10^12 km, and Futura Free clocks in at 9.4 minutes exactly.

Regardless of one’s opinion of his music, Frank Ocean’s masterful artistry is irrefutably illustrated on Blonde. The lens of duality he presents all the issues he scrutinizes through transcends his songwriting, encompassing all aspects of the album’s existence and even his own life. Ocean’s music not only imitates the thematic patterns that have followed him throughout his life and that he has learned to document so well, but as one adage presents it, his life “imitates” the art itself in a cyclic pattern of its own. While Ocean has not released an official LP for over four years now, which may appear as an extensive wait, unpacking and truly understanding all the thematic content and lore surrounding Blonde alone could take a lifetime. Hopefully, sometime in the near future, a student will get the chance to write about Ocean’s next album through an even greater “Lens” of their own.